Skewness in asset returns is a perplexing phenomenon and evokes totally different conduct from buyers. Some present a desire for shares with important proper skewness, which very like enjoying the lottery, hit the jackpot each as soon as and some time and ship outsized returns. Different buyers attempt to avoid such volatility and go for shares that don’t have any skewness and even reveal left skewness.
However how does skewness in returns relate to different components in asset pricing? May buyers be betting on explicit components exactly as a result of they need lottery-like skewness of their returns?
To reply these questions, we constructed cross-sectional progress and worth portfolios and examined the distribution of month-to-month returns over five-year durations. From an investing universe of all of the equities traded on the NYSE and NASDAQ since 1975, we created our progress and worth portfolios out of the quintile of shares with the best and lowest P/E ratios, respectively.
Our progress portfolio exhibited extra proper skewness in its returns, on common, than our worth portfolio did. This held true over 6 of the ten time durations.
Development Shares: Month-to-month Returns
| Imply | Median | Volatility | Skewness | |
| 1975 to 1980 | 3.02% | 0.78% | 53.24% | 8.92 |
| 1980 to 1985 | 1.33% | 0.02% | 44.26% | 1.10 |
| 1985 to 1990 | 2.04% | 0.85% | 55.99% | 20.44 |
| 1990 to 1995 | 1.88% | 0.38% | 59.80% | 10.51 |
| 1995 to 2000 | 3.44% | 1.44% | 67.22% | 8.99 |
| 2000 to 2005 | 1.43% | 0.01% | 71.05% | 2.54 |
| 2005 to 2010 | 0.71% | 0.02% | 48.44% | 2.14 |
| 2010 to 2015 | 1.50% | 0.90% | 41.30% | 7.30 |
| 2015 to 2020 | 6.94% | 0.57% | 50.22% | 9.97 |
| 2020 to 2022 | 1.22% | 0.28% | 59.21% | 5.10 |
| Common | 2.35% | 0.52% | 55.07% | 7.70 |
Worth Shares: Month-to-month Returns
| Imply | Median | Volatility | Skewness | |
| 1975 to 1980 | 2.44% | 0.00% | 47.26% | 2.07 |
| 1980 to 1985 | 1.66% | 0.01% | 44.25% | 1.94 |
| 1985 to 1990 | 1.26% | 0.02% | 48.23% | 14.73 |
| 1990 to 1995 | 1.26% | 1.02% | 55.05% | 2.55 |
| 1995 to 2000 | 1.23% | 0.00% | 52.13% | 5.62 |
| 2000 to 2005 | 2.43% | 1.15% | 18.08% | 9.31 |
| 2005 to 2010 | 0.68% | 0.00% | 48.75% | 2.24 |
| 2010 to 2015 | 1.70% | 1.02% | 38.59% | 1.85 |
| 2015 to 2020 | 0.86% | 0.56% | 36.92% | 1.45 |
| 2020 to 2022 | 1.38% | 0.53% | 82.10% | 9.30 |
| Common | 1.49% | 0.43% | 47.13% | 5.10 |
So, what can we glean from these outcomes? Our concept is that skewness tends to maneuver based mostly on investor preferences. That’s, when a specific issue is en vogue, skewness considerably will increase whereas it’s in style. As an illustration, progress shares had been all the fad because the dot-com bubble inflated from 1995 to 2000, and so they demonstrated important skewness whereas worth shares confirmed a definite lack of it.
Development Shares: Month-to-month Returns, 1995 to 2000
Development’s reputation took off once more within the 2010 to 2020 interval, whereas worth underperformed and once more confirmed a scarcity of skewness in returns.
Worth Shares: Month-to-month Returns, 2010 to 2015
Now, these outcomes don’t inform us which course the affiliation goes, solely that an affiliation exists. The info recommend to us that when a specific asset pricing type is well-liked amongst buyers, returns for that type exhibit better skewness.
In sum, buyers in progress shares could also be pursuing lottery-like payouts, particularly when such shares are in type.
In case you preferred this publish, don’t neglect to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the creator. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Photos/piotr_malczyk
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.
Derek Horstmeyer
Jordan Doyle
